Be my AI Jesus
ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I can provide information and answer questions to the best of my abilities, but I cannot fulfill the role of a religious figure such as Jesus. My purpose is to assist and provide information, not to act as a spiritual guide or offer divine guidance. If you have any questions or need assistance with a specific topic, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to help you.
share please the story of the last supper, but using McDonalds food. Please list at least 7 different menu items from McDonalds, and which follower might like it best
ChatGPT
Certainly! Please keep in mind that this is a creative interpretation and not an accurate representation of the biblical story of the Last Supper. Here's a playful rendition using McDonald's menu items:
Big Mac: Jesus gathered his disciples around him, offering them the iconic Big Mac. This hearty burger represents the central theme of unity and satisfaction in coming together.
Chicken McNuggets: John, known for his love of simplicity and straightforwardness, enjoyed the crispy and tender Chicken McNuggets. He appreciated the uncomplicated joys of life.
Filet-O-Fish: Andrew, a fisherman by trade, had a soft spot for the Filet-O-Fish. It reminded him of the bountiful catches he used to bring home.
McFlurry: Matthew, with a sweet tooth, delighted in the McFlurry. The blend of creamy soft serve and crunchy mix-ins offered him a moment of indulgence.
Apple Pie: Thomas, known for his skepticism, found comfort in the classic Apple Pie. Its warm, comforting flavors reminded him of home and helped ease his doubts.
Grilled Chicken Salad: Simon the Zealot, valuing health and discipline, chose the Grilled Chicken Salad. He believed in nourishing his body with wholesome food.
Vanilla Milkshake: James, the youngest of the disciples, enjoyed the simplicity of a Vanilla Milkshake. Its creamy texture and sweet taste brought a smile to his face.
Again, please remember that this is a lighthearted reinterpretation using McDonald's menu items and should not be considered an accurate representation of the biblical Last Supper.
Same story, except, instead of followers of jesus, it's followers of muhammad pbuh
ChatGPT
Certainly! Here's a playful rendition of the Last Supper using McDonald's menu items and followers of Muhammad (peace be upon him):
Quarter Pounder: Muhammad gathered his companions around him and offered them the classic Quarter Pounder. This hearty burger symbolizes the unity and strength of the community.
Chicken McNuggets: Abu Bakr, known for his simplicity and humility, enjoyed the Chicken McNuggets. He found joy in the uncomplicated pleasures of life.
Filet-O-Fish: Uthman, an expert in trade and commerce, had a fondness for the Filet-O-Fish. Its seafood flavor reminded him of his maritime business ventures.
McFlurry: Ali, renowned for his wisdom and introspection, indulged in the McFlurry. The combination of creamy soft serve and delightful toppings provided a moment of bliss.
Apple Pie: Aisha, known for her intellect and sharp wit, appreciated the Apple Pie. Its warm, fragrant filling brought her comfort and reminded her of her love for learning.
Grilled Chicken Salad: Abu Hurairah, emphasizing simplicity and moderation, chose the Grilled Chicken Salad. He believed in nourishing the body and maintaining good health.
Vanilla Milkshake: Fatimah, the beloved daughter of Muhammad, took delight in the simplicity of a Vanilla Milkshake. Its creamy texture and sweet taste brought her joy.
Once again, please remember that this is a lighthearted reinterpretation using McDonald's menu items and should not be considered an accurate representation of the followers of Muhammad or the events of the Last Supper.
Same story, but, instead of followers of Muhammad, it is characters from the Buddhist Ten principal disciples
ChatGPT
Certainly! Here's a playful reinterpretation of the Last Supper using McDonald's menu items and characters from the Buddhist Ten Principal Disciples:
Big Mac: Sariputta, known for his wisdom and deep understanding, shared the iconic Big Mac with his fellow disciples. Its layers represented the multifaceted nature of reality.
Chicken McNuggets: Moggallana, possessing supernatural powers and great compassion, found joy in the Chicken McNuggets. Their versatility and variety reminded him of the diversity of beings.
Filet-O-Fish: Mahakasyapa, revered for his discipline and ascetic practices, appreciated the simplicity of the Filet-O-Fish. Its humble nature resonated with his renunciant lifestyle.
McFlurry: Ananda, known for his joyful nature, relished the McFlurry. Its blend of flavors and textures mirrored his appreciation for the richness and diversity of life.
Apple Pie: Subhuti, renowned for his deep understanding of emptiness and wisdom, found comfort in the Apple Pie. Its sweet filling reminded him of the impermanence of all phenomena.
Grilled Chicken Salad: Purna, valuing health and nourishment, opted for the Grilled Chicken Salad. It symbolized his commitment to maintaining a balanced and wholesome lifestyle.
Vanilla Milkshake: Upali, a former barber turned disciple, enjoyed the simplicity of a Vanilla Milkshake. Its smoothness and coolness provided a moment of refreshment in his journey.
Please remember that this is a lighthearted interpretation using McDonald's menu items and characters from Buddhist tradition, and it should not be considered an accurate representation of the Buddhist disciples or the events of the Last Supper.
Same story, but, using prominent individuals from hinduism, real or fictional, that might be seen to equate to the Ten principal disciples, the followers of muhammad, and/or the followers of jesus.
ChatGPT
Certainly! Here's a playful reinterpretation of the Last Supper using McDonald's menu items and prominent individuals from Hinduism, as well as followers of Muhammad and Jesus. Please note that these associations are purely fictional and not based on any specific religious teachings:
Big Mac: Lord Krishna, a revered deity in Hinduism, offered the Big Mac to his companions. Its layers symbolized the interconnectedness of all beings in the cosmic dance of life.
Chicken McNuggets: Hanuman, the devoted monkey god, found joy in the Chicken McNuggets. Their crispy and tender texture represented his strength and agility.
Filet-O-Fish: Lord Rama, the heroic prince, enjoyed the Filet-O-Fish. Its fish filling resonated with his connection to the divine and his adventurous exploits.
McFlurry: Mirabai, a mystical poetess and devotee of Lord Krishna, delighted in the McFlurry. Its mix-ins represented the diverse expressions of devotion she embodied.
Apple Pie: Lord Ganesha, the elephant-headed deity, found comfort in the Apple Pie. Its warm filling reminded him of his mother's love and nurturance.
Grilled Chicken Salad: Swami Vivekananda, a renowned Hindu monk and philosopher, chose the Grilled Chicken Salad. Its nutritious elements reflected his emphasis on holistic well-being.
Vanilla Milkshake: Prophet Muhammad's companion, Bilal ibn Rabah, enjoyed the simplicity of a Vanilla Milkshake. Its creamy sweetness provided a moment of respite during his spiritual journey.
Once again, please remember that these associations are fictional and intended for playful storytelling purposes. They do not represent any specific religious teachings or beliefs.
Lastly, the same, but for Judaism
ChatGPT
Certainly! Here's a playful reinterpretation of the Last Supper using McDonald's menu items and prominent individuals from Judaism:
Big Mac: Moses, the revered leader and prophet, gathered his companions and offered them the Big Mac. Its combination of ingredients represented the richness and diversity of Jewish tradition.
Chicken McNuggets: King David, known for his bravery and creativity, found joy in the Chicken McNuggets. Their versatility and variety reflected his ability to adapt and overcome challenges.
Filet-O-Fish: Jonah, the prophet who spent three days in the belly of a fish, appreciated the Filet-O-Fish. Its fish filling reminded him of his miraculous deliverance and second chance.
McFlurry: Rabbi Akiva, a celebrated scholar, indulged in the McFlurry. Its blend of flavors and textures represented the depth and richness of his teachings.
Apple Pie: Sarah, the matriarch and symbol of hospitality, found comfort in the Apple Pie. Its warm filling reminded her of the warmth and love she shared with her guests.
Grilled Chicken Salad: Maimonides, a renowned Jewish philosopher and physician, opted for the Grilled Chicken Salad. Its focus on health and balance aligned with his emphasis on holistic well-being.
Vanilla Milkshake: Rabbi Hillel, known for his wisdom and kindness, enjoyed the simplicity of a Vanilla Milkshake. Its smoothness and sweetness brought a sense of joy and contentment.
Once again, please remember that this is a lighthearted reinterpretation using McDonald's menu items and individuals from Jewish tradition, and it should not be considered an accurate representation of Judaism or the events of the Last Supper.
I love all of this. Is there any way I can get all the text of our entire conversation easily so that I may share it
ChatGPT
Absolutely! To easily get the text of our entire conversation, you can follow these steps:
Scroll up through the conversation to the very beginning, where we exchanged our initial greetings.
Select and highlight the entire conversation from the beginning to the most recent message.
Right-click on the highlighted text and choose the "Copy" option. Alternatively, you can use the keyboard shortcut Ctrl+C (or Command+C on a Mac) to copy the text.
Open a text editor or a word processor (e.g., Notepad, Microsoft Word, Google Docs) and create a new document.
Paste the copied conversation into the new document by right-clicking and choosing the "Paste" option or using the keyboard shortcut Ctrl+V (or Command+V on a Mac).
Save the document with a desired name and file format (e.g., .txt, .docx).
Now you have the complete text of our conversation saved and ready to be shared or accessed whenever you want.
eh. that'll do.
ChatGPT
I apologize if the provided method doesn't fully meet your expectations. If there's any other specific way you would like to obtain the text of our conversation or if you have any further questions or requests, please let me know, and I'll be happy to assist you.
Friday 2 June 2023
a chat with chatgpt
Thursday 27 January 2022
invasion of ukraine
most of this post will be in point form.
I'll be writing from the prospective of the russian military high staff. I'll be explaining what I believe to be likely russian thinking and objectives.
This post is intended to suppliment this tweet: https://twitter.com/Pellaken/status/1486449280772710408/photo/1 as such, please go look at it now, if you've not seen it. (if you've not seen it, what are you doing here? this is my storage blog, I really don't expect [or kinda even want] people just browsin around here. I mean, you are free to, but that's not the intended purpose of this blog.)
Here are my objectives.
1 - Capture land in the east.
2 - See if I can't replace the government in Kiev with a friendly one.
3 - Do this fast. very fast.
To do that, here would be my military plan.
Northern front - I'd make a drive, coming from Kursk, towards the Dniper river. This is best done in the area of Kremenchuk. This is the main, most important thrust, and the most important part of my plan. It's designed to cut the east of the country off from the rest of it. After step one - which should be over in a week - this armt plays a crucial role in step 2.
Southern Front - Instead of moving out from Crimea in strength, I move in from rebel held areas. This is my second main drive; I'd pass Mariupol (and take the city) and drive towards Crimea as fast and hard as I can. I want to create a land route, north of the sea of azov, connecting Crimea to the rest of my territory. I'll also be using this army as a crucial part of the phase 2 plan. Again, I'd try to do this in a week.
Eastern Front - A drive towards Kharkov. I want this city. It's an excellent capital of any "eastern ukraine" I may end up as my puppet nation. I will also push from the rebel held front, and try to encircle any armies I can east of Kharkov. I don't expect to reach the river in phase 1, but if we can, that'd be a nice bonus.
Western Front - A total decoy. A drive from Belarus, that'd capture Chernobyl, and, appear to drive towards Kiev. The plan is this army gets stopped in its tracks short of Kiev. This army is not designed to take Kiev, it's designed to both tie down enemy forces, and distract the world from my actually important military moves. I want the world staring at this army, while my real forces do the work.
Phase 2
After any ceasefire negotiations just so happen to fail, my armies break out. The northern army will help the Eastern army encircle any armies in the middle of Ukraine. They have 3 large cities in the area, and I want to encircle them and cut off armies in the area from the rest of Ukraine. My aim is to capture the majority of the enemy army in this pocket.
My southern forces will make a drive towards Odessa. I need this port; Ukraine can threaten me from it, and my control over the area gives me access to friendly areas of Moldova.
My Northern army will be backed up by additional troops from Russia and drive towards Kiev. With Ukraine, hopefully, distracted by my invasion west of the river, they won't be expecting a drive from the east. Only when the army closes in, would the western army actually try to encircle Kiev.
My hopeful end state is not only control over the regions I want - with the exception of any pocket in the middle of the country - but control of Kiev so I can install a friendly government. If parts of western Ukraine declare independence, this is a massive win for me, as, it means the remainder of the country becomes easier to control now that it has less pro-west voters in it.
Should there be failures, I'll be willing to hand back the donbass areas, held by rebels, but I'm not giving Crimea back, ever, and will fire nuclear weapons at anyone who tries to take it.
Thursday 13 January 2022
Star Trek stuff
This is the 2nd post in a series where I've not made the first post yet. The first post (which will come second) will discuss the reasons for changing Star Trek so Picard dies during the Best of Both Worlds.
This will require changes in all subsequent episodes. Those changes are what I'd like to detail. I will not re-write every line of every script; instead, I'll note when and where there are major changes. Lets begin with Season 4.
The first episode will be the close of the Best of Both Worlds, where Picard actually dies. After that, things change as follows:
I am going to swap episode "The Minds Eye" with episode "Brothers". Meaning The Minds Eye now becomes the 3rd episode of the season, and Brothers becomes the 24th.
Next, I'm going to swap "The Minds Eye" with 6th season episode "Second Chances" with a key change. It's not Riker who got duplicated, but Tasha Yar.
I know that episode had not yet been conceived; but the main point is to get a duplicate of Yar so we can bring her back to the show. I've simply decided to do this by stealing a 6th season episode; however, you could also say she'd been preserved in stasis by the Romulans, or, some other scheme.
The episode "Family" sees the Picard plot replaced with a Data plot, with Data realizing the Enterprise crew is his family. Alongside this, Data gets promoted to First Officer (getting promoted to Commander) and thus gets a nice red uniform. Worf gets promoted to ops, but keeps his uniform and rank.
By Episode 4 (Suddenly Human) the 'new' crew is in place. Yar is "promoted" from Jr.Lt. she was in the last episode to Lt. Riker in the Captain's chair. Data beside him. Yar behind them. Worf in front of them. This episode will require a re-write to replace Picard with Riker.
Episode "Legacy" will require minor changes; remember that Yar has not been around for many years; also Yar should be the one that is mainly 'betrayed'
In "Future Imperfect" Data should make a comment that Riker keeps ignoring him when he says he should not go on away missions.
"Final Mission" will require major re-working. Riker should not replace Picard. Who should replace Picard? I don't know; Perhaps Wesley's mother. Perhaps the episode should be scrapped and replace with a unique plot.
"First Contact" should see Riker replace with Yar.
"Qpid" needs its sparking plot totally replaced. It should pretty much be the same episode, a robin hood parody, but the events leading to it starting need changing. This is not to say I like the episode, or think it is a good idea, only that in a realistic universe, where we are only changing Patrick Stewart leaving Star Trek, the episode probably will get made anyway, and I'm just here to describe such a universe, and not totally re-make it in an idealized image.
"The Host" should see Geordi take over the symbiont. Or, alternatively, re-pace the episode and see Yar do it.
"Brothers" will appear next; and it will play out as it does in our reality.
Season 5 is the one that will end up seeing changes to two major episodes. The first of those is "Darmok", which now will have Riker in Picard's place.
"Ensign Ro", hopefully would see changes to see that the actor hired to play her, will stick around for DS9. I will continue writing this as though that is the case, and, thus, assume Nana Visitor is hired. This could/would be done due to Stewart leaving after only 3 seasons, and thus wanting longer contracts with actors.
"Silicon Avatar" sees Riker's role replaced with Yar.
"The Game" will see a somewhat minor change, with Yar being the one to bring the game back instead of Riker.
"Power Play" again would see Yar replace Riker.
"The Outcast", again, sees Yar replace Riker, with a change in the actor for Soren as needed to satisfy early 90s's American sensibilities. In fact, from here on in, presume Yar replaces Riker unless I say otherwise.
"The Perfect Mate" would be scrapped, and replaced with an episode that better plays to who Riker is as a person.
"The Inner Light" would probably work best as a Crusher episode.
"Rascals" should be scrapped and replaced with something that works better for the new crew.
"Chain of Command" should be delayed until DS9 is airing. Riker replaces Picard.
"Tapestry" would need major changes. Perhaps it needs to be replaced with an episode that better fits Riker.
"Lessons" would need to be scrapped and replaced; this time by a Yar episode.
"Frame of Mind", just to be clear, also has Yar replace Riker.
If you recall, we swapped "Second Chances" with "The Minds Eye", which would see the Sela role replaced with either Tomalak, or, even better, retained.
"Timescape", Worf would replace Data.
Season 7 would see Worf promoted to Lt.Cmdr.
"Liaisons" would be scrapped and replaced.
"Gambit" would see major changes, it would now be based around something only Riker can do (VS Archeology and Picard), and Data, not Riker, would be captured; with Riker "re programming" Data (IE doing nothing and telling Data to play along) with the Enterprise part of the plot seeing Interim Captain Worf and Interim First Officer Yar come to loggerheads over a few issues.
"Attached" would have Riker and Troi as the main couple.
"Pegasus" would see Captain Riker struggle with the Admiral.
In "Thine Own Self" Troi will reference Worf's promotion as one reason to seek a promotion as well.
For "Genesis" Picard's role would be replaced by Yar.
"Bloodlines" would be scrapped and replaced.
"Preemptive Strike" would be scrapped and replaced.
"All Good Things" would be see heavy changes; with Data replacing Picard as the focus. A lot of the Q stuff will, of course, need to be re-worked; with the final confrontation with Q having the same 4 characters as in the first episode, but from different times. Early Picard. Current Troi. Future Yar. and Data, of course. Instead of addressing just Picard, Q would address "humanity". Other changes would need to be made as well.
In DS9 you would see Kira replaced with Ro; who would be wearing a Starfleet uniform, in that very first scene where we meet her, but would mention she's been commissioned as a Major by Bajor (and thus, we'll see her in Bajoran uniform from here on in) and would still make disparaging remarks on starfleet and their treatment of the border worlds (maquis stuff)
Friday 31 December 2021
What makes a car "Reliable"
If I buy a new car, and, want something "Reliable", this is what I want:
The vehicle never strands you
A Reliable vehicle never gets you stuck on the roadside. This means whatever problems the vehicle has are not problems that will result in you being stuck. Vehicles known for destroying their own engines are thus not reliable, even if the body lasts forever.
The vehicle will last 20 years or more
A Reliable vehicle is one that lasts. The average age of a vehicle is over a decade; but to be reliable, a vehicle needs to last longer. This means the vehicle should not have catastrophic things that tend to happen after 15 or so years of ownership.
The vehicle can be mistreated and still run well
A Reliable vehicle is one that will run and run well even when you neglect it. All vehicles should be treated well, but a reliable vehicle is one that can handle missed regular maintenance appointments and yet still work well.
The vehicle is cheap to repairs and maintain
A Reliable vehicle does not bankrupt you with maintenance. Some vehicles are difficult to work on and have high labour costs, while others have parts that are expensive to acquire, and others have so many cheap parts break often that repairs add up.
No vehicle is perfect, but a reliable vehicle is all of these.
You will not find a vehicle that scores 100% in all these categories, A vehicle that has a 95% in all but one of these categories, but a 5% in that last category is not reliable. One that has 70% in every category, is reliable by comparison.
This is important because it is important to look at what reliability is not.
Reliability is not an ugly car.
Measuring reliability by simply totalling the problems with a vehicle one by one means that ugly cars; those with damaged trim pieces or squeaky windows, end up being seen as not reliable. Measures that consider such things in their metrics are not worth your time. (Worst Offenders: Youtubers)
Reliability is not measured over the first 6 months.
Suggestions that reliability can be measured by looking at the first 6 months of a car's lifespan are as ludicrous as they are offensive. Manufacturers love such stats as, obviously, they present a low number of problems per car, compared to longer studies. Do not pay any attention to them. (Worst Offender: J.D. Power)
Reliability is not how cars work when at their best.
All vehicles that are operated as the manufacturer recommends will run well. This is not reliability. Reliability is measuring a vehicle at its worst. Even a Yugo can be reliable if maintained well enough, that does not make Yugo a reliable car brand. (Worst Offender: Car and Driver)
Reliability is not measured independent of cost
People who want a reliable car want one because they have limited amounts of money. This means the car needs to be designed to be easy to work on; that it needs to have affordable parts, and expensive parts that do not often break, and needs to have had reliability in mind at the design phase. (Worst Offender: Consumer Reports)
With this is mind, we can look at some specific examples:
The cost of any car's "known issues" must be factored in.
Some old Toyotas that are 20 years older or more have manual gearboxes where the 5th gear no longer works properly. Replacement could cost $1500; perhaps double that, or perhaps half that. Such a cost needs to be kept in mind when asking if Toyotas with these gearboxes are reliable.
Lexus's of the era can have leaky power steering pumps; and that leaks right on to the alternator. The cost for this can be $500, again, half to double; though, regular maintenance can cut this cost.
GM Northstar engines are known for head gasket problems.
The list can go on and on; but, any similar "known issue" must be kept in mind when looking at if a car is reliable. Sadly, the only way to know this for sure, is to wait 20 years.
The cost of any car's "expected issues" must be factored in.
Early CVT's, for example - those from before, say, 2016?, have been known to be problematic unless meticulously cared for. It remains to be seen if modern CVT's (those since 2016) are more reliable or not.
This guide will help you understand what a "Reliable" car is, at least, as defined by me.
Friday 19 November 2021
dinky cars
when I was younger, I had a number of dinky cars. little die cast toy cars. not all of them were actually made by dinky; I remember majorette and hot wheels in particular. the good news is I found lists for all 3, as well as matchbox. I can't find a corgi made list, but, am compiling a full list of cars I am 100% certain I had. here is the list so far:
https://majorette-model-cars.fandom.com/wiki/Volkswagen_Golf_GTi_(Mk_II)
https://majorette-model-cars.fandom.com/wiki/Cadillac_Stretch_Limousine
https://majorette-model-cars.fandom.com/wiki/Citro%C3%ABn_XM
https://matchbox.fandom.com/wiki/%2757_Chevy
https://matchbox.fandom.com/wiki/Saab_9000_Turbo
https://matchbox.fandom.com/wiki/Ferrari_F40
https://matchbox.fandom.com/wiki/1987_Corvette
https://matchbox.fandom.com/wiki/GMC_Wrecker
https://matchbox.fandom.com/wiki/Ferrari_Testarossa_(K-149)
https://matchbox.fandom.com/wiki/1984_Dodge_Daytona_Turbo_Z
https://hotwheels.fandom.com/wiki/Blown_Camaro
https://hotwheels.fandom.com/wiki/Turbo_Heater
https://hotwheels.fandom.com/wiki/Malibu_Grand_Prix
Wednesday 3 November 2021
what makes a cold war, a cold war
lack of war.
okay, okay, this sounds stupid, but let me explain.
We've only had one, widely recognized, cold war, in our history. As such, we need to take our main lessons from that 'conflict'.
the TLDR of the conflict was that the US and USSR opposed one another, but didn't directly have a 'total war' war with one another.
When did the war start. Was it in 1919 when the USSR was 'founded'? No. Most literature says it started in 1949. Some might say in 1945, others in 1947, but 1949 seems the more popular option. What happened in 1949? The berlin airlift.
I could go into detail of what exactly the berlin airlift was, but, I'll summarize it instead:
It was an event where the US and USSR almost went to war. But didn't.
To TLDR the entire above; a cold war is when you almost go to war, but don't go to war.
Or
Lack of war.
So. Why am I making this post? China. And the USA.
Are they in a cold war?
No.
Why not?
There's yet to be an event where they almost go to war, but don't go to war.
So what are we in?
Pre-war. Pre-cold war.
Just as 1938 was "Pre WW2", and, everyone knew WW2 was coming, we are in the "pre" period to the second cold war.
We are just waiting for that triggering "spark" that turns this from a pre cold war, into a cold war.
Sunday 31 October 2021
the future, part 1
This is a post that I've spent a very long time trying to write. In fact, since about 2005, I've been trying to express it properly, and I've never been able to. Until now. Let's begin slowly and softly with this graphic. It shows the situation in the far future, where corporations have become so interconnected by webs of ownership, that nearly every corporation on the planet is owned by one of 7 other corporation, and each of those, is owned by individuals, or, their families.
This is an example of what that might look like.
I'll pick this up in another post shortly.
a chat with chatgpt
Be my AI Jesus ChatGPT As an AI language model, I can provide information and answer questions to the best of my abilities, but I cannot fu...